"Sharp, quirky, and occasionally nettlesome", Walking the Berkshires is my personal blog, an eclectic weaving of human narrative, natural history, and other personal passions with the Berkshire and Litchfield Hills as both its backdrop and point of departure. I am interested in how land and people, past and present manifest in the broader landscape and social fabric of our communities. The opinions I express here are mine alone. Never had ads, never will.
I found this collection of bones while walking the Berkshires. I put all that I could find in this bag and brought them home. Then I called the police.
What are they? What made me suspect foul play?
Comments
Perseverance pays off, Charlie. These are the rib bones (and a couple of vertebrae) of an eastern Timber Rattlesnake, a protected species in the states where it is at the extreme edge of its contiguous range north of Pennsylvania. What are significantly missing are the head and rattles. An owl or hawk would have left evidence of the rattles and probably also the skull. Someone killed the snake and took these as trophies. It happened long enough in the past for the skeleton to be picked clean, but the Environmental Police needed to know that the site was still vulnerable to poaching and that is what I shared with them.
You might also have noticed a few pine needles in the bag. I found the skeleton very near a known timber rattlesnake den, though they can roam miles from their den sites.
came across this massive snake while investigating...http://hillcountryofmonroecountry.blogspot.com/2007/06/rattlesnake.html
so I'm guessing the poacher skinned the snake and removed the bones for the meat on the spot. the vertabrae is a clue, maybe along with the clean break on some of the ribs.
O.K., CSI fans, here's what you need to do. If you study the bag closely, you will find that it contains bones that are almost all the same type. And there are alot of them. You might also notice something else in the bag that tells you a bit more about the site where I found the bones, and you'll get extra points for that, but focus on the bones. So many bones...and almost all the same sort. What sort? What kind of animal has so many of them?
Nope. I called the Environmental police because the animal in question is a state-listed rare species and was clearly poached. Now who is gonna figure out how I knew that? Besides the seven years previous employment with The Nature Conservancy, I mean.
Ok, now I'm thinking about it. Animal--small, bigger than a squirrel, possibly a rabbit, but knowing where you are, I'd guess it's possibly a groundhog, beaver, unlikely an otter, but definitely a mammal. unless of course it's not.
culprit: look for a hawk. Mammals don't destroy skeletons quite like that. Aside from humans, I mean.
Perseverance pays off, Charlie. These are the rib bones (and a couple of vertebrae) of an eastern Timber Rattlesnake, a protected species in the states where it is at the extreme edge of its contiguous range north of Pennsylvania. What are significantly missing are the head and rattles. An owl or hawk would have left evidence of the rattles and probably also the skull. Someone killed the snake and took these as trophies. It happened long enough in the past for the skeleton to be picked clean, but the Environmental Police needed to know that the site was still vulnerable to poaching and that is what I shared with them.
You might also have noticed a few pine needles in the bag. I found the skeleton very near a known timber rattlesnake den, though they can roam miles from their den sites.
Posted by: Tim Abbott | February 03, 2008 at 02:04 PM
came across this massive snake while investigating...http://hillcountryofmonroecountry.blogspot.com/2007/06/rattlesnake.html
so I'm guessing the poacher skinned the snake and removed the bones for the meat on the spot. the vertabrae is a clue, maybe along with the clean break on some of the ribs.
Posted by: Charlie Crystle | February 03, 2008 at 01:55 PM
ok, too many bones for a bird or mammal that I can think of. rattlesnake.
Posted by: Charlie Crystle | February 03, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Is it a porcupine?
Posted by: Thomas MacEntee | February 03, 2008 at 08:12 AM
I'm out of my league here...
Posted by: Charlie Crystle | February 03, 2008 at 05:11 AM
O.K., CSI fans, here's what you need to do. If you study the bag closely, you will find that it contains bones that are almost all the same type. And there are alot of them. You might also notice something else in the bag that tells you a bit more about the site where I found the bones, and you'll get extra points for that, but focus on the bones. So many bones...and almost all the same sort. What sort? What kind of animal has so many of them?
Nuff hints. See what you can do.
Posted by: Tim Abbott | February 02, 2008 at 10:02 PM
Nope. I called the Environmental police because the animal in question is a state-listed rare species and was clearly poached. Now who is gonna figure out how I knew that? Besides the seven years previous employment with The Nature Conservancy, I mean.
Posted by: Tim Abbott | February 02, 2008 at 09:50 PM
Cat? And you called the animal control officer to get the coyote?
or is that still just a west coast thing?
--ml
Posted by: Marty Lnageland | February 02, 2008 at 08:32 PM
So click on the bag. Almost all the bones are...what?
Posted by: Tim Abbott | February 02, 2008 at 07:41 PM
Ok, now I'm thinking about it. Animal--small, bigger than a squirrel, possibly a rabbit, but knowing where you are, I'd guess it's possibly a groundhog, beaver, unlikely an otter, but definitely a mammal. unless of course it's not.
culprit: look for a hawk. Mammals don't destroy skeletons quite like that. Aside from humans, I mean.
Posted by: Charlie Crystle | February 02, 2008 at 07:38 PM