Something is wrong on the mountain. There are places in these granite hills where eastern timber rattlesnakes still bask and congregate. Despite hundreds of years of human fear and ignorance and relentless pressure from illegal poaching, these heavy bodied snakes persist in parts of the Berkshire and Litchfield Hills and in isolated pockets across the northeast Highlands where they are legally protected as state-listed rare species.
But one of the largest dens in our area, a site where it was common only a couple of years ago to find dozens of snakes at a time, is virtually devoid of timber rattlesnakes this year. State wildlife officials and licensed rattlesnake monitors are alarmed that only a couple of snakes have been seen and, what is more disturbing, there are no gravid females. At this time of year, there should be many snakes close to their birthing and denning areas, yet at this superb occurrence the woods are empty and the breeding females are gone.
I have posted before on the fragile relationship between these much maligned serpents and the ecology of this region. Even under the best of circumstances, timber rattlesnakes have poor reproductive success and their populations remain stable. The loss of a reproducing female has a disproportionately large impact on the entire population. Predation and other natural mortality cannot account for the apparent loss of an entire reproductive class of mature individuals within a single population. With persistent searches by conservation authorities yielding the same disappointing results, the only logical explanation is that someone, or a group of individuals, is deliberately depleting this site and removing gravid females.
The network of nuisance rattlesnake responders that works with conservation authorities to monitor den sites in this region has been closely monitoring a known individual with close ties to this area and who has stated his intention of reestablishing timber rattlesnake populations in New Hampshire and Maine. Misguided and illegal tampering with established dens has no basis in conservation science and is without sanction or justification. This individual is offering rewards for information about existing den sites in northern New England where timber rattlesnakes are thought to be extirpated.
Anyone who offers cash for the location of timber rattlesnake populations in states where they are protected rare species, and who is not a fully sanctioned representative of the appropriate state agency with authority for the conservation of this species, is not to be trusted. Anyone who moves a timber rattlesnake without such authority, especially across state lines, is breaking the law. Anyone with any information about such individuals should contact the appropriate law enforcement and conservation authorities.
In the meantime, there is a hole in the heart of the mountain, an absence that most of us will never recognize but is there nonetheless. Whether this site becomes yet another empty den, or remains a sanctuary for these rare snakes, depends on our collective ability to curtail illegal harvesting of gravid females. The species cannot afford a second year like this at this site.
As someone who spent much of my childhood wandering the woods of the hill towns, I truly fail to see why this is a bad thing for anyone but the folks up north who are going to have these snakes dumped near them.
Posted by: PSP | September 18, 2006 at 09:21 PM
Ah, very cool snakes. Threatened species in NJ, as your research no doubt informed you. They apparently vibrate their tails when threatened but are neither venomous nor do they have rattles. They cane get pretty big, though. I've never seen one.
Posted by: GreenmanTim | September 03, 2006 at 01:12 AM
They were northern pine snakes, Tim. I did a bit more searching around and came up with the name I couldn't remember.
Posted by: Laura | September 02, 2006 at 10:26 PM
There is no subspecies of rattlesnake in the Northeast that is specific to dune systems. The timbers have upland dens and with few exceptions no longer not come East of the Highlands in the mid- Atlantic states. Lakehurst sounds like a naturalist's delight - given the clearance to enjoy it!
Posted by: GreenmanTim | September 01, 2006 at 07:22 PM
Is there such a thing as a Pine Barrens Rattlesnake? A quick google search didn't answer that.
A few years ago I went on a nature walk at Lakehurst Naval Station with an excellent government naturalist and there was a special snake that he had been studying there on the base. Can't remember what it was.
If you ever have the opportunity to wander around Lakehurst (not likely since 9/11) - it's a great place and has some nice grassland habitat for birds and other wildlife.
Posted by: Laura | September 01, 2006 at 06:40 PM
Thanks for that link, Tim.
I'm not sure I remember what it looked like. There was no one else around that late spring day that I could point it out to either. I asked the local *expert* some time later and he too suggested the hognose snake as they are sometimes seen there in the dunes at North Pond, but I don't know snakes at all to remember the details of what I saw.
It was big (take that for what it's worth!), but not so big as to send me running away screaming.
Posted by: Laura | September 01, 2006 at 06:33 PM
Laura, there are plenty of snakes that might be found at Sandy Hook. Not timber rattlesnakes, but perhaps you were fortunate enough - at least those of use who enjoy seeing unusual snakes would consider you fortunate - to have seen an eastern hognosed snake. They have triangular heads and fat bodies like vipers but are not venomous. They like pine barrens and systems with sandy substrates. They have the disconcerting habit of playing dead when threatened, and are particularly fond of toads. It is not listed as rare in New Jersey but is watched carefully because its population numbers are decreasing. This link provides more information: http://www.fcps.k12.va.us/StratfordLandingES/Ecology/mpages/eastern_hognose_snake.htm
Otherwise, there are lots of other common snakes that you might have seen at Sandy Hook but without a description I'm not going to be able to narrow down the possibilities. What did it look like?
Posted by: GreenmanTim | August 31, 2006 at 11:07 AM
I agree with Genevieve. I'd like to know they're out there (waaay out there). lol!
I only ever met a snake once; out in the dunes at Sandy Hook. Forget what type it was - maybe you can make a guess, Tim?
I was pretty startled by it, but glad to have come across it. Glad too that I spotted it sunning on the dune trail before I stepped on it.
Posted by: Laura | August 30, 2006 at 09:50 PM
I'm really sorry to hear about the empty rattlesnake den. Rattlesnakes are one of many animals that I like to know are still thriving in the wild, even though I don't wish to ever encounter one.
Posted by: Genevieve | August 30, 2006 at 07:52 PM
Moving fish from one place to another is also a great way of moving bait, such as earthworms, to systems where they do not naturally occur and where they can dramatically alter soil structure and nutrient cycling. Invasive worms are a hot topic in some conservation circles. As for critters on range land, Sam's overall "live and let live" approach does him credit. It is not easy to coexist with venomous snakes, which is why I am a nuisance rattlesnake responder in a couple of northeast states. It is far preferable to have someone like me to call who is licensed to appropriately assist a snake out of a conflict situtation than to reach for a shovel or shotgun.
Posted by: GreenmanTim | August 29, 2006 at 02:28 PM